renewableenergy

Obama Federal Lawsuit Obama Be Removed as a Candidate No. 08-cv-4083
For Immediate Release: - 08/21/08
For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire Suit Filed
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 08/21/08
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005 No. 08-cv-4083
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@gmail.com
Philip J. Berg, Esq. Files Federal Lawsuit
Requesting Obama
Be Removed as a Candidate as he does not meet the
Qualifications for President
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 08/21/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, [Berg is a
former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania; former candidate for Governor and
U.S. Senate in Democratic Primaries; former Chair of the Democratic Party in
Montgomery County; former member of Democratic State Committee; an attorney with
offices in Montgomery County, PA and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA, filed a
lawsuit in Federal Court today, Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083, seeking
a Declaratory Judgment and an Injunction that Obama does not meet the qualifications to
Z\\FORMS\PressReleaseObama08212008 2
be President of the United States. Berg filed this suit for the best interests of the
Democratic Party and the citizens of the United States.
Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in his lawsuit that Senator Obama:
1. Is not a naturalized citizen; and/or
2. Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or
3. Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and
Indonesia.
Berg stated: “I filed this action at this time to avoid the obvious problems that
will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.
There have been numerous questions raised about Obama’s background with no
satisfactory answers. The questions that I have addressed include, but are not limited to:
1. Where was Obama born? Hawaii; an island off of Hawaii; Kenya;
Canada; or ?
2. Was he a citizen of Kenya, Indonesia and/or Canada?
3. What was the early childhood of Obama in Hawaii; in Kenya; in
Indonesia when he was adopted; and later, back to Hawaii?
4. An explanation as to the various names utilized by Obama that
include: Barack Hussein Obama; Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack
Dunham; and Barry Dunham.
5. Illinois Bar Application – Obama fails to acknowledge use of names
other than Barack Hussein Obama, a blatant lie.
If Obama can prove U.S. citizenship, we still have the issue of muti-citizenship
with responsibilities owed to and allegance to other countries.
Z\\FORMS\PressReleaseObama08212008 3
Berg continued:
“Eighteen million Democratic Primary voters donated money, volunteered their
time and energy, worked very hard and then not only supported Senator Clinton, but
voted for her and often recruited other supporters as well. All the efforts of supporters of
legitimate citizens were for nothing because this man lied and cheated his way into a
fraudulent candidacy and cheated legitimately eligible natural born citizens from
competing in a fair process and the supporters of their citizen choice for the nomination.
Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were defrauded by
Senator Obama's lies and obfuscations. He clearly shows a conscience of guilt by his
actions in using the forged birth certificate and the lies he's told to cover his loss of
citizenship. We believe he does know, supported this belief by his actions in hiding his
secret, in that he failed to regain his citizenship and used documents to further his
position as a natural born citizen. We would also show he proclaims himself a
Constitutional scholar and lecturer, but did not learn he had no eligibility to become
President except by means of lying, obfuscations and deceptions. His very acts proves he
knew he was no longer a natural born citizen. We believe he knew he was defrauding the
country or else why use the forged birth certificate of his half sister?
Americans lost money, goods and services donated in their support of a candidate
who supposedly was a natural born citizen simply because the DNC officers and party
leaders looked the other way and did not demand credentials to answer the questions and
prove whether or not Senator Obama was a legitimately natural born citizen, even in light
of recent information that has surfaced on websites on the Internet suggesting Senator
Obama may not be eligible to become President and questioning his status of multiple
citizenships and questionable loyalties! If the DNC officers and.or leaders had
performed one ounce of due diligence we would not find ourselves in this emergency
predicament, one week away from making a person the nominee who has lost their
citizenship as a child and failed to even perform the basic steps of regaining citizenship
through an oath of allegiance at age eighteen [18] as prescribed by Constitutional laws!
Z\\FORMS\PressReleaseObama08212008 4
The injunctrive relief must be granted because failing to do so, this inaction
defrauds everyone who voted in the Democratic Primary for a nominee that is a fair
representation of the voters. Failure to grant injunctive relief would allow a corrupted,
fraudulent nomination process to continue. It not only allows, but promotes an
overwhelming degree of disrespect and creates such a lack of confidence in voters of the
primary process itself, so that it would cement a prevailing belief that no potential
candidate has to obey the laws of this country, respect our election process, follow the
Constitution, or even suffer any consequence for lying and defrauding voters to get onto
the ballot when they have no chance of serving if they fraudulently manage to get
elected! It is unfair to the country for candidates of either party to become the nominee
when there is any question of their ability to serve if elected.
All judges are lawyers and held to a higher standard of practice than a regular
lawyer. It is this Judicial standard that demands injunctive relief prayed for here. This
relief is predicated upon one of the most basic premises of practicing law which states no
lawyer can allow themselves to be used in furthering a criminal enterprise. And by that
gauge alone, failing to give injunctive relief to the 18 million supporters of the other
candidate, a true natural born citizen eligible to serve if elected, this court must not allow
itself to be used to further the criminal and fraudulent acts to continue and be rewarded
by becoming the Democratic Nominee. Failure to give the injunctive relief prayed for
will insure that a corrupted Presidential election process will only guarantee a show of
unfair preference of one group of people over another group by not demanding the same
rules be applied to all groups equally and fairly, especially in light of the fact that both
candidates are each considered a minority.
# # #
* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to
obamacrimes.com

American economy in crises - a long time coming

When a country and its society import more than they export for over a quarter of a century, it is bound to erod the economy to its primate state.

We have only ourselves to blame, what goods and products are we exporting, what goods and services are produced in the USA, the answer is very little by comparison.

In the past 50 years as our population has increased, technology advanced, we have become a nation that consumes enormous amounts of resources, we shop for competitive prices. Corporate America is constantly looking to increase the bottom line.

Most of the goods for and by Americans and its companies are produced overseas and in the past decade with the advancement of telecommunications, many of the services sector are also imported.

The increased costs of energy over the past 10 years, has affected the economy to unimaginable comprehension.

This economic activity has eroded our economy to its core. It seems that the situation is getting worse every year. American debts are increasing beyond our wildest dreams, endangering the future economic vitality of our future generation.

I hope it is not too late for our society to recognize the graveness of our economic predicament and its resolve to take appropriate action to stem the tide of our economic downturn.

Americans are a nation of great technology and knowhow. We must utilize that technology and our resources to find new means to regain our economic independence.

We must face and implement fiscal responsibility, both by the government and the population with its infrastructure of corporate America.

It is no longer an option, it is a must if we as a nation want to survive and retain our way of life and economic vitality.

Inflation, recession and financial crises are here. Let us take the bull by the horn, initiate immediate actions to minimize and hopefully reverse our economic crises.

Jay Draiman, Northridge, CA.

PS
The US economy has enormous momentum. Metaphorically speaking, if someone turned off the locomotive that drives the US economy, the economy would go on for miles before anyone would likely notice something was wrong. But something has been wrong for many years. Is there really hope for the future? Maybe. But the terrible truth is that no one really knows. But if there is hope, we're already on the wrong track. And that has to change..

Unauthorized Charges on Your Local Phone - Utility Bill?
How to Find Them, Eliminate Them & Get Your Money Back!
If your business still gets its phone service through the old "AT&T and Verizon, etc" local phone company (as opposed to one of the newer competitive phone providers) then you need to double check your phone bill each and every month for charges you did not authorize. You may not know it but the local phone company allows other companies to bill you through your local phone bill. And while the local phone company allows other businesses to bill you through your local phone bill, the local phone company does not verify that the charges being billed to you by the other company are valid. When these unauthorized charges fraudulently appear on your phone bill it's called "cramming". Unfortunately you as the business owner or manager are the only one that can spot the unauthorized charges and if you don't comb over your bill every month to spot these unauthorized charges - you'll pay for them.
Why does the local phone company allow other companies to pass charges onto your phone bill? "Third-party billing" is supposedly a great convenience in that you only have to pay one bill instead of separate bills for obvious authorized phone related charges like yellow-page advertising in the "real yellow pages", 411 information calls and long-distance calls from your chosen long distance carrier. Over the years though, some less-than-scrupulous companies have realized that most businesses rarely scrutinize their local-phone bills. To take advantage of this, these companies have come up with elaborate schemes to place
unauthorized charges on your phone bill that you'll end up paying for without even thinking. Unauthorized
charges you can end up paying for include charges for unwanted (and unused) email accounts, web sites,
directory information calls, directory advertising in obscure publications, voice mail accounts and other
services.
In theory, before these charges can be placed on your phone bill, the company that is originating the third-party billed charges is supposed to have a verification of the order like a voice recording. In reality though,
all the company needs to do to initiate the charge is submit your name and phone number to the billing
entity. The verifications are only required to be produced if a complaint is filed.
To prevent these charges from appearing on you business phone bill it's helpful to understand the four
parties that make unauthorized third party phone charges a costly reality. Party number one is any
employee who can answer your business phones. The unauthorized charge is rarely random and it usually
happens after one of your company employees gets a telemarketing call. Employees should be instructed to
document and report any overly aggressive telemarketing calls they receive. Party number two is the
telemarketing company that originates the unauthorized charges by trying to get your employee to accept
some service for which you'll be billed through your local phone bill. Party number three is the third-party
billing company that has billing agreements with your local phone company. The name of the third-party
billing is the one that is prominently displayed on your phone bill. After the third-party billing company's
name is the name of the company that is originating the unwanted charges. Party number four is your "former Ma Bell" local phone company that collects the unwanted charges (keeps a share for "Ma") and then passes the rest to the third-party billing company (who keeps a big share) and then passes the balance on to the company that initiated the unwanted charge.
Following are some of the top third-party billing names and unauthorized charge originators you'll find on
your phone bill. If you see these names on your phone bill you'll want to call the toll free number listed next to the charge to confirm it's a charge that's been properly authorized to be placed on your bill. Following are actual examples that we've recently found while auditing business phone bills.
We recommend customers should review any utility bills issued by deregulated utility companies. (In most instances today, consumers are paying higher charges to the deregulated gas and electric supply companies).
All Utility - Energy, gas, electric and water bills should be reviewed for proper reading and tariff.
If you suspect that you have been overcharged ask for detailed explanation and or file a complaint with your State Utility Commission.
Compiled by: Jay Draiman, Utility Auditor